i am seriously agreeng with u. the big spenders will be stronger
i am seriously agreeng with u. the big spenders will be stronger
Against. Not even all reached the 100 level and...
This will lead to an even wider gap between regular players and the strongest top-players.
Gaming for the usual guys will be even more difficult. Someone even leaves the game.
✔ Galaxy Legend FB-group
Unqa.s938 | world871 | android | Lv: 100 | VIP: 5
Fleet:
Sirenne[+2] {Kit+4}
Incendos[+2] {Jack+1}
Kraing[+2] {Du'doria}
Aquos[+2] {Zaffrey+4}
FS[+2]
Paul Müller & ender Bean wiggins have give good reason.
For the economical place, Paul Müller is totally right, if you release the r7 nobody spend for r5,r6 maybe dual r6. That's make less money for you.
Ender Bean wiggins is right for the necessity of more merge ! It's so boring to fight 2 dead servers where only 10-20 players play again and when we're more than 150 !
More, what the utility of the base stat of each commander if the new r7 are too many powerfull ?
An old commander could be more interresting than an expansive new one with this bonus so why spend for the new expansive commander ?
Philidox.s199 world199 android
Lvl100
Current fleet : incendos / cabal / hunter / aquos
[AoW]
Галактонит r7 вводить рановато, он нужен, но позже, игра и так очень зависима от вложений игроков своих реальных денег, по этому в топе будут-именно те, кто больше заплатит, это приведет к большой потере игроков и-игра прекратит свое существование, вместе с введением нового галактонита, необходимо кардинально пересмотреть-вопрос цен, да и вообще сам смысл вложений, а то получается, кто платит, тот и играет, а остальным просто нет шансов, по моему мнению, это просто не честно и не справедливо, тут высматривается просто зарабатывание денег из воздуха, только для своей выгоды и только, складывается ощущение, что это все не-надолго и в скоре игра развалится. А те кто-ее создает и продвигает, заберут деньги и-придумают новую.
R7 stones are not necessary. The growth with every R-galactonite is 0,5%. R-6 is +2,5% per level. R-7 should be +3%. But we already have dual R6 galactonite which are +3 so there is not logic in this. Also R-6 duals will be twice better than R-7 because they are combined 2 different types. And the game will be unbalanced because rich players will take big advantage than normal players who don't spend so much money.
Я думаю,что R7 не должен быть введён т.к
1.На него будут очень большие цены.
2.Новым игрокам будет намного труднее догнать более развитых в этой игре.
3adrot.s511 Мир 1414 lvl 42 Андроид
That will be a big mistake you recently create the Meteor Gala and introduce new r6 dual, so many things at the same time it doesn´t have any sense to make this soon
Rampage.s454 World 1357 Android
Level 108
With the introduction of dual R6s the game is unbalance, I agree on that.
How would R7 help people who quit the game want to come back? They won't know about the R7s (IF they are introduced) because they no longer follow the game and so won't be coming back.
The ones affected will be us, who are still playing and would now have to face overpowered people with dual R6s now getting R7s because it is within their ability to get them by the fact they already have dual R6s.
So end result, will be greater frustration of players who will then stop playing.
Over and over again, we see a good example of how this is happening in unmatched Pandora, the overpowered servers gets less players as time goes by because they give up - there is no hope for them to get even the crumbs.
Some supporters though initial read seems to support having R7, have some thoughts that betray their real thinking is like.
8 of the 17 supporters have reservations or caveats on the introduction of R7. That's almost 50% of the R7 supporters. In other words 50% of them should be in the fence sitters area at best or should be in the refuters group instead. Do they really want R7s?
Quick summary
- 3 of them actually think the game will be imbalanced so would like them to be limited by level
- 3 of them actually think the game will be imbalanced so would like them to be limited basic attributes (not percentage increase)
- 2 think that players will be driven away
The reservations, caveats, worries, and BUTs fall into the following 7 categories
- free way to get them
{google translated}
- basic attributes
- limited to high levels for game balancing
{google translated}
- impossible to beat with 100% stats
- should be rare and only for defensive attributes only
- drive away players, players loose interest stop playing
{google translated}
- play imbalance - give everyone single player 1 for free
Do R7 supporters really support R7?
Or have other agenda? Like
- with R5, R6 more accessible, become more competitive
- make R6s dual R6s cheaper:
{google translated]
What about fence sitters?
3 negatives
- feeling resigned
- unequal / unfair
- Sharp decline in number of players
2 positive
- an edge over others
- renewed interest in game
1 suggestion on implementation of R7